Bessent Refuses to Comment on Trump,IRS06/04 06:22

   

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent refused to say Wednesday 
whether President Donald Trump and his family would still get immunity from IRS 
audits after the administration abandoned plans for a $1.776 billion 
compensation fund that would have benefited the president's allies.

   "There's continuing litigation, and I'm unable to comment on ongoing 
litigation," Bessent told lawmakers at the Senate Finance Committee hearing.

   It was a frustrating answer for Democratic lawmakers looking to get answers 
from Bessent at a hearing ostensibly focused on the Treasury Department's 
budget and came a day after acting Attorney General Todd Blanche seemed to 
indicate that the portion of the settlement dealing with the IRS audit immunity 
would still be in effect for the Republican president.

   After several failed attempts to get Bessent to answer, Sen. Catherine 
Cortez Masto, D-Nev., said, "It's been very clear you're dodging this and 
you're trying to use it as an excuse. It's just outrageous on behalf of the 
American public."

   The White House referred the Associated Press to Secretary Bessent's 
comments in response to an inquiry about the status of the settlement. In the 
Oval Office on Wednesday, Trump did not confirm whether the compensation fund 
had been scrapped or was simply on hold. "I'd have to ask the lawyers, I don't 
know," he told reporters. "As far as I'm concerned, it was a beautiful thing," 
he said.

   The administration decided to scrap plans for the compensation fund, which 
could have included payouts to participants in the Jan. 6, 2021, riot at the 
U.S. Capitol, after bipartisan outrage and a fierce political backlash that 
threatened to stall key elements of the White House agenda. Still, the status 
of the IRS immunity deal as part of the controversial settlement crafted to 
resolve Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS remained unclear, though 
Blanche said Tuesday that "nothing has changed" in that regard.

   Last week, a federal judge in Florida overseeing Trump's lawsuit against the 
IRS, who had initially dismissed the case, reopened the case and ordered the 
president's attorneys to respond to allegations that Trump abandoned his claims 
to avoid the court's scrutiny of the deal.

   When she initially dismissed the case, Kathleen Williams, the judge handling 
the lawsuit, admonished the Justice Department for a lack of transparency and 
said no agency "submitted any settlement documents nor filed any documents 
ensuring that the settlement was appropriate where there was an outstanding 
question as to whether an actual case or controversy existed."

   Matt Platkin, a former New Jersey attorney general now at the law firm 
Platkin LLP, which is representing lawmakers and judges challenging the 
settlement agreement, called it "one of the greatest scams in American history."

   He told The Associated Press that Blanche's testimony on Tuesday over plans 
to scrap the weaponization fund and grant Trump audit immunity "underscores the 
need for the court to continue its inquiry in Florida."

   Lawmakers on Wednesday tried to grill Bessent on the agreement without 
success.

   "Secretary Bessent owes the committee an explanation of what the Treasury 
knows about the dirty settlement. That's because his department was involved 
from beginning to end," said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.

   Wyden asked Bessent: "Does the IRS audit immunity given to Trump, his 
family, and his businesses still stand?"

   Bessent declined to answer, citing the unresolved legal dispute.

   If audits and examinations into the president's taxes were thrown out under 
the settlement, an untold figure could be wiped from his bill to the federal 
tax collector.

   Previous reporting from the New York Times and ProPublica shows that a 
long-standing audit of a technique Trump reportedly used to avoid paying taxes 
years ago could have resulted in an estimated $100 million bill if the IRS had 
found wrongdoing.

   Even some Republicans expressed concern on Wednesday over the plan to shield 
Trump from the IRS.

   Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La., speaking to reporters outside the chambers, said, 
"I don't think any American should have a deal like that."

   Nina Olson, founder of the Center for Taxpayer Rights, which has sued the 
Trump administration over IRS disclosures to immigration enforcement, called 
the settlement "the lowest point for the IRS since the 1970s and President 
Nixon's efforts to help his friends by trying to stop IRS audits of them and 
hurting his enemies by urging IRS audits on them."